I’ve been in the studio in brief and sparse bursts and while I haven’t come close to accomplishing the number of projects I had hoped to by this time, I am very proud of what I have created. I’ve been working on drypoint printmaking. It’s a time consuming and laborious effort (but not prohibitively so) both from the artist’s and printer’s perspective. The end result, however, is unlike anything else, even among prints.
These are not copies of existing images on paper but the result of a completely print-based effort. The image is engraved into a copper plate by hand with a diamond tipped scribe. That plate is, in a sense, the original image. Each plate is then inked and prepped by hand for each pressing of each individual image. Because of this, each image in an edition is unique. The ink is captured in the burs and grooves engraved into the plate and with all the excess wiped clean, the image is all that remains. Because of the softness of the plate and the immense amount of pressure from the press, the plate degrades fairly quickly until the image is barely discernible on the plate’s surface. While some might see this as a drawback, I appreciate that it keeps editions to a tidy limit. I’ve always had a problem with people charging top dollar for digital color copies that can be printed and reprinted endlessly. With these prints, if there is a run of six, someone can essentially walk a way with one-sixth of the original.
The printing was handled by Chad Andrews who operates a pair of antique presses under the name Paper +. As the printer is not just duplicating the image but interpreting it, a working relationship has to be established that allows for the artist to understand the process and the printer to understand the artist’s vision. I think we’ve reached a good understanding of each other’s dialect in the overlapping languages of art and printmaking.
Both the process and image are a welcome departure from what I’ve been doing with pen, ink and watercolor and while I don’t expect or intend to get away from watercolors entirely, it’s a nice switch for a while. When time permits, I can see myself going back and forth between the two and seeing how one informs the other.
These prints will be available for purchase directly from me in very limited quantities at the Roc City Tattoo Expo (Aug 20-22) and Absorb Music Festival (Aug 28). If there are any left after these events, I can be contacted directly about purchasing them.
Wow, has it really been a month and a half since my last post? Indeed, I have taken an unexpected, and frankly unwanted hiatus from much of my life outside of the things that keep my personal and interpersonal ship afloat. A lot has happened that has made me want to get on here and post but, as is so often the case when I’m burned out or burning out, I either have time, energy or neither but never both. Hopefully things will get back to (ab)normal around here soon. I’ll start in the immediate future with an image post as I completed some prints last night. I’d like to see things get back on track soon as this little corner of the internet has become strangely important to me.
Finally — someone in a position to do something is calling Judge Rotenberg Center’s discipline-by-electric-shock methods torture. You may remember a couple of previous posts (here and here) about JRC’s electrically shocking children, many with special needs, in addition to aggressive use of restraints, withholding food and just general abuse and bullying labeled care. These are not exceptions or anomalies but the very approach the school is built upon. They are using pain and fear to alter children’s behavior and they are doing so openly — even as a selling point — and sadly, there is a public buying. Parents that would almost certainly never take a job in an office that shocks them to keep up production and compliance are packing their kids up and dropping them off for this. Some of these children have psychiatric diagnoses and behavioral issues, others developmental disabilities including autism.
From the Patriot-Ledger:
A top United Nations official has described as torture the shock treatments used by the Judge Rotenberg Center on some of its special needs students. Manfred Nowak, the Austrian lawyer who is the U.N.’s special rapporteur on torture, in May asked the federal government to investigate the use of electric shocks at the school in Canton.
Earlier this year, the U.S. Justice Department opened an investigation into whether the center violates federal disability laws by disciplining and controlling students with electric shock therapy.
“I have no doubts about it,” replied Nowak when asked if the practice is torture in an interview broadcast on ABC-TV’s “Nightline” this week.
Nowak sought the investigation after reviewing a report critical of the center by Mental Disabilities Rights International, a human rights organization.
Thanks in part to ABC’s Nightline who featured JRC story (which I missed), A wider public is aware of what’s happening under our noses — and worse, that it’s been happening for decades. Is that enough? I would hope that we are collectively disturbed enough by what’s going on to insist upon an end to it but the public doesn’t get too bent out of shape unless it’s their own pristinely “normal” children at the receiving end of the abuse. I would love to be wrong about that.
There is no question. This is torture. This is an abuse of human rights. The fact that it is done in a school setting or under the pretense of “therapy” or to troubled and troubling kids is irrelevant if not even more damning and it shouldn’t take 39 years, the network news and the UN’s special rapporteur on torture to tell us that.
• • •
You can contact Massachusetts governor, Deval Patrick HERE. Find out what he thinks, in the face of another election, of his governing over the only state in the nation to allow a facility like this to exist and thrive — and get the attention of the UN’s special rapporteur on torture. After all, people are shipping their kids up from other states with enough sense to ban such treatment. More importantly, tell him what you think of the torture of children and the disabled being carried out in Massachusetts. Demand change.
You wouldn’t think it would take so long for me to put one up, but I’ve now posted a gallery. Click the link or look up and click the box that says Gallery in the green bar up top.
It’s not necessarily current and not remotely complete but it’s something. I’ll still post my pieces on the main page when words seem necessary or the image timely but check the gallery once in a while too. If nothing else, it’s an organized way to see the pieces collectively.
I’ll be adding to it shortly as I’ve got some really exciting and very limited print projects in the works, thanks in no small part to the guidance and printing skills of artist and educator, Chad Andrews. I’ll let you know more about that soon.
Dr. Scott Reuben has been sentenced to six months in federal prison for proving to be one of the most fraudulent players in an increasingly fraudulent pharmaceutical industry. While his behavior is nothing new one, arrests like this do not seem to come along often. I can only hope it’s a sign of things to come — but I won’t hold my breath. I’m left wondering if he was arrested for perpetrating fraud or for not being good enough to keep it hidden.
From The Day:
Dr. Scott S. Reuben, a prolific pain researcher at Bay State Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., who during a 12-year span is believed to have faked at least 21 studies, will also have to return more than $360,000 to drug firms, including Pfizer, that gave him money for research. Pfizer will receive more than $300,000 in the deal that Reuben reached with federal prosecutors as he pleaded guilty earlier this year to one count of healthcare fraud.
Other fines and penalties in the case will require Reuben to repay nearly half a million dollars to various parties.
His faked studies include among others, studies for the drugs Celebrex and Vioxx. The latter of course, was pulled from the market due to concerns about its safety. You may remember those “concerns” adding up to more than 25,000 deaths by the FDA’s estimate.
Purported studies published in well-regarded medical journals specializing in anesthesia have since been retracted…
Rueben’s studies had been seen as pioneering when they were published. His data had supported the use of two of Pfizer’s major products – Celebrex and Lyrica – in combination to treat certain types of post-operative pain.
Of course his studies were pioneering — they were made up. With some of his studies pulled and others remaining on the books, one has to wonder if any are legitimate or if some just haven’t proven to be frauds — yet. I would certainly not want to be on a drug that was shown to be safe by one of the most fraudulent drug researchers in pharmaceutical history. One also has to wonder how many other doctor have faked studies in the major medical journals — or are we supposed to think Reuben’s the only one?
Pfizer getting their money back doesn’t mean they’re blameless either. It seems likely that they were happy to keep paying him as long as he kept coming up with the right answers. Sadly, frauds in this arena seem to be overlooked all too often. I say sadly because millions of lives hang in the balance while their products are sold in staggering quantities based on the work of researchers who are often paid more for supporting a company’s interests than carrying out research with anything resembling actual integrity. As Jim Edward for BNET put forth in an informative article on the topic,
Pfizer wasn’t looking for research that simply broadened doctors’ knowledge of how Cox-2 painkillers work. It was almost certainly using that research to bolster its “operate for cash” promotion, in which pharmaceutical sales reps persuaded surgeons to write “protocols” for using Pfizer’s Bextra and Celebrex as post-operative painkillers instead of opioid drugs. Such uses were not approved by the FDA.
With all of the money these doctors are getting paid to study the safety and efficacy of drugs that they’re simultaneously paid to promote on the lecture circuit (read: pharma sales pitches as continued education), is a conflict of interest even in question?
Can a state’s Office of Protection and Advocacy do its job with only half of the information and the other half concealed to shield government agencies and state hospitals instead of citizens?
From the Associated Press:
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court says it will decide whether Virginia’s advocate for the mentally ill can force state officials to provide records relating to deaths and injuries at state mental health facilities.
I’m not sure why anyone would think there should be such a blind spot in an agency’s assessment of these facilities. Force implies resistance. Shouldn’t information like that be turned over upon request or even voluntarily recorded and addressed?
The justices agreed Monday to review a federal appeals court ruling dismissing the state advocate’s lawsuit against Virginia’s mental health commissioner and two other officials.
Backing the appeal, the Obama administration said the ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond “threatens to undermine the enforcement of federal laws that Congress designed to protect especially vulnerable individuals from the abusive and neglectful practices that can result in injury and death.”
The Virginia advocate’s office, like those in the other 49 states, was created under two federal laws that give states federal money for monitoring the treatment of the mentally ill in state facilities. The first law grew out of public reports in the 1970s of crowded, filthy conditions and abusive treatment of mentally retarded children at the Willowbrook State School in New York.
The issue for the court is whether the Eleventh Amendment prohibits a state agency from going to federal court to sue officials of the same state. The state itself could not be sued in the same circumstances.
Argument will take place in the fall or winter.
The case is VOPA v. Reinhard, 09-529.
To read a brief summary of VOPA v. Reinhard II, click here (PDF).
Excerpt (emphasis mine):
The P&A system in Virginia is the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy (VOPA). In 2006, VOPA sought records relating to three incidents of deaths and injuries to residents of the Central Virginia Training Center (CVTC) and Central State Hospital (CSH) that occurred while these residents were in the custody of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS) (now called the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services). When DMHMRSAS refused to provide the records, VOPA sought a declaration that this refusal violated federal law…
Additionally, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals is in conflict with a recent federal case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Indiana, who noted that states cannot be allowed to shield their state hospitals and institutions from investigation and oversight — especially not the investigation and oversight created by Congress to fund some of the state’s most vulnerable citizens.
The Virginia decision has effectively rendered VOPA unable to fully exercise its federal authority to protect vulnerable citizens throughout the Commonwealth, even though Congress specifically created P&A systems for protection purposes. Without access to the records from state-run facilities, VOPA has no way of completing an investigation—and without a complete investigation, VOPA has no way of protecting Virginians with disabilities from abuse and neglect.
Sometimes blogs like this give us the opportunity to do much more than offer up snapshots from our fairly ordinary lives or our opinions on the state of the world around us. Just as with every word we speak out in the real world, we have a multitude of opportunities to say something that matters. When someone’s words offer us a chance to become a part of the solution, those words become an action whether in speech, on paper or in the glow of our screens — and that is why I so often visit and repost from Gianna Kali’s Beyond Meds.
The following is lifted entirely from Beyond Meds. These are Gianna’s words not mine. I say that to give credit, not to separate myself from it as there is nothing in the post that I do not fully endorse. That’s why it’s here.
John Hunt is a trauma survivor with a diagnosis of ‘paranoid schizophrenia’. He has spent over four years locked up in Carraig Mor psychiatric treatment centre in Cork city, Ireland.
He has been over-medicated on an array of psychotropic medications with dangerous adverse effects. He has had tardive dyskinesia, akathasia and has developed incontinence. His physical/ mental/ emotional/ spiritual health has been severely neglected and has deteriorated since being in Carraig Mor.
He has had no access to a rehabilitation team or psychotherapist and no day release in two years. There are no plans to rehabilitate John and return him to the community where he belongs. He is merely maintained and contained. John and his family have no voice in relation to his future. We are afraid that John’s physical health is being damaged considerably. We cannot stand by and watch this happen any longer.
Facebook cause: The incarceration of John
The blog: The incarceration of John
Check back later for more links. Grainne is being swamped with calls from reporters today, but she will update me with more links when she is able. Please look a the other work Grainne has done for this blog as it’s extremely inspiring and will also shed more light on what is happening to John.